Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1363

reference
196-tree-1
name
1363
tree-preservation-order

undefined

196-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027437 50.864893)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027381 50.864887,-1.027383 50.864898,-1.027391 50.864908,-1.027403 50.864916,-1.027419 50.864922,-1.027437 50.864924,-1.027454 50.864922,-1.027470 50.864917,-1.027483 50.864909,-1.027491 50.864899,-1.027494 50.864888,-1.027492 50.864877,-1.027484 50.864867,-1.027471 50.864859,-1.027456 50.864853,-1.027438 50.864852,-1.027421 50.864853,-1.027405 50.864858,-1.027392 50.864866,-1.027384 50.864876,-1.027381 50.864887)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL